Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

2-2 Discussion_16805...
The drive to cut costs and boost profits, the belief that workers are readily replaceable, and a lack of understanding or awareness about the detrimental effects that low pay may have on employee well...

2-2 Discussion
2-2 Discussion

The drive to cut costs and boost profits, the beli

Week 5 Assignment_16...
solution is an image format

Week 5 Assignment
Week 5 Assignment

solution is an image format

Module 8 Discussion_...
Hello Class, The company's I have worked for have used QuickBooks in the accounting department. I personally would not suggest this software for a big company. Small companies would be ok to use Quick...

Module 8 Discussion
Module 8 Discussion

Hello Class, The company's I have worked for have

Week 2-Case Analysis 2

Week 2-Case Analysis 2

Q The purpose of this Case Study Analysis is to understand the fundamental elements and enforceability of online contracts. Instructions: Review Case #5.3 in your text. At the end of each case there are questions, for each question include: a. The general answer to the question b. Identify the relevant statutes/legal doctrines/Federal acts or laws that are demonstrated. *Note that these can be from this chapter or previous chapters* c. Fully define the relevant statutes/legal doctrines/Federal acts or laws that are demonstrated. d. Explain how they apply and what it means for future cases of a similar nature. Submission Instructions: • Submit your case as a WORD document in the drop box for that assignment. (Properly formatted in MLA) Grading Criteria: • Refer to the grading Rubric for case analyses for additional guidance. • Worth 2 Points Due Sunday by 11:59pm EST.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
1) Plaintiffs acknowledged in the joint status statement that they would arbitrate their claims collectively since doing so would not have been economically possible and because the arbitration forum required by the Agreement was "blatantly skewed" against consumers. Dell's request to halt the litigation and order arbitration was granted by the district court. The district court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute when the plaintiffs refused to follow the arbitration order. Because the arbitration forum required by the Agreement was "blatantly prejudiced" against consumers, the plaintiffs are appealing both the dismissal and the underlying arbitration order (Craig, 2013).